Remember a few short months ago when the democrats and the democratian were blasting the idea of Home Rule?

Yeah, it wasn't that long ago when the left was freaking out:

From the democratian:  .

 In Our View: Solutions … No Problems
 County commissioners once again ponder reforming local government
 Tuesday, March 19, 2013

When a wild goose chase clearly defines itself before it even begins, responsible travelers will decline to embark on the journey. Such is the case before Clark County commissioners as they ponder another expedition into the well-known futility of changing county government to a home rule charter.

Another apt metaphor for this crusade is a solution in search of a problem. Voters have rejected a proposed home rule charter three times in 20 years, most recently in 2002. This micro-introspection of a macro-bureaucracy became so yawn-inducing in 2011 that county commissioners declined to even pull out the stethoscope. Seven public meetings were attended by a grand total of 113 people. (The level of interest might have been even lower than such a paltry number denotes, because there's no way of knowing how many people attended multiple meetings). In response, county commissioners correctly declined to pursue the matter further.

We'll see if the new board of county commissioners is equally perceptive. They could consider the matter this week.

Granted, all forms of government should be subject to frequent review, as a healthy method of being held accountable. But on this repair job, we're having a hard time finding what's broken.

Reforming county government could include any of a dozen or more changes, none of which have been accompanied by any measurable public demand. This lack of motivation might explain why only six of 39 counties in Washington have adopted home rule charters. As Erik Hidle explained in a Saturday Columbian story, potential changes could include giving residents referendum powers on county issues, changing some elected offices to appointed jobs, increasing the number of commissioners and making office nonpartisan.

More:

And from the local democrat party's direct swindle sheet:

Proposed changes in county charter could be awful

Clark County’s government structure is somewhat antique and outdated. A system invented to manage road construction and not much else in the way of governance clanks along clumsily in a high-speed era of complex and varied civic action.

Streamlining and modernizing the machine appeals to the progressive psyche, but the folks who have convinced the Board of Clark County Commissioners to consider adopting a new county charter have other agenda priorities.

They hope to give rural interests dominance over urban values. They suppose they can make it harder for county government to raise and spend money on social problems and infrastructure capital.

They are far away from achieving their goals, but inattention from thoughtful citizens could ease their path.

Without much evident public support, the charter-change advocates have persuaded the county commissioners to start the ball rolling toward charter change for the third time in recent history. In January the board formally adopted a resolution to consider a move from the present form of government to something different.

Different how? That depends entirely on a panel of elected freeholders and how ably they can sell their program.

So far the county commissioners have ordained that, should the charter process go forward, each of the three commissioner districts will be represented by five freeholders who would be elected at the Nov. 8 general election. Any registered voter would be qualified to seek election to the board of freeholders. Upon their election the freeholders would establish a schedule of hearings and meetings for the consideration of what might be included in a new county charter. Upon a majority vote by the freeholders, the Board of Clark County Commissioners would be obliged by tradition if not certainly by law to lay the proposed charter before the electorate.

 Here's was the critical element and why Stuart, then-Commissioner Boldt, the democrats and the democratian freaked out over even the possibility:

They hope to give rural interests dominance over urban values.

That's it.  In a nutshell.  In democrat land, having "urban values" dominate "rural interests" is just swell.  But the other way around?

Not so much.

And NOW, all of a sudden, because Commissioners Mielke and Madore hired Sen. Don Benton to run Environment, that's ALLLL changed... at least for the whackers on the left.

And here's the thing: I hope they do it.

The democratian, however seems to be strangely silent on the issue.

Maybe it's because as dim a bulb as Brancaccio is, even he can see through the haze clearly enough to understand that first:  the democrats risk the most here, because there is little question that either a Home Rule charter or any other mechanism that would result in district general elections would likely result in a permanent GOP Majority on the council.

Further, even if there was a charter, there's no way it could be set up to micromanage legal personnel decisions.

So, by all means: get that charter thing going on.  I support it because, of course, with a charter, we could ignore clowns like Leavitt and hold a county wide vote on this disaster he's brought us to known as the CRC Scam... if it exists beyond June, that is.

It's got to be tough when the Mayor of Vancouver is an outright liar.

It's just a damned shame, really.

A political career, soon to be snuffed out, that started with such promise.

Now, desperation is starting to sink in. Desperation that the CRC is over,.  Desperation that the bridge contractor this slimeball is working for will lay him off when the senate kills the CRC funding and he gets crushed for re-election.  Desperation that the voters will kick his ass to the curb just like he kicked his lie-from-the-beginning-tolls-scam to the curb as soon as he could.

I'm hearing that Leave-it already knows it's over... that the money ain't moving out of the Senate any time real soon and the fed window is going to slam shut on his dreams of screwing us... Leave-it wandering around the senate, BEGGING those people to move the money.

How's it feel, Timmy?

I know it ain't happening.  In fact, the best is yet to come.  Maybe you know that as well... but to lie in writing?  To lie about the positions of key senators concerning tolls?  What kind of a moron are you, anyway?

Well, THAT is just, plain, Stupid.

With a capital S.

Here's how that works:

(Mailing list information, including unsubscription instructions, is located at the end of this message.) __

Good Morning,

Below is an exchange of Emails between Hiz Honor Mayor,” I was against bridge tolls before I was for them”  Leavitt, Yours Truly, Senator’s Don Benton, and Ann Rivers.  

In response to my Did You Know #2 Exposing the True Cost of Bridge Tolls, Hiz Honor found it necessary to advise me in Capital Letters that Senator Don Benton and Senator Ann Rivers (both Republicans) supported Bridge Tolls.  It is amazing how some politicians change their spots after being elected.  The Good Mayor must have forgotten that during Governor Chris’  run for Governor Hiz Honor, clinging to the coat tails of well know Republican Dino Rossi, he was pretending to be a Republican.  I can still see him at a fund raiser introducing Dino Rossi. 

As you can see from Senator’s Benton’s email sent 2/28 at 4:24 PM and Senator River’s email sent 2/28 at 5:27 PM, they have made it quite clear that they do not support Bridge tolls or the CRC as currently proposed.

 Next Hiz Honor appeared with his email of 2/28 to chastise the senator by asking them to return some of the tax dollars Vancouver sends to Olympia.  Actually, Hiz honor would have more dollars to fix our roads and highways if he and his current Gang of 4 and his predecessor did not waste our hard earned tax dollars on boondoggles such as the financially failing Hilton Hotel and Convention Center, eight financially failing publicly owned parking garages, and outrageous property tax kickbacks to developers in the form of tax breaks.

Next in his BTW sent on 2/28 at 5:23 PM email Hiz Honor attempts to take me to the Woodshed because
a.    I am a conservative
b.    Stating that I refused to answer his question:

(a)    Would I prefer an increase in sales tax, property tax or business tax?  You’re Honor that is like asking someone if they have stopped beating their wife.  

Mayor Leavitt I am somewhat older than you and can recite chapter and verse of why Revenue Enhancement (taxes to us non-politicians) must be increased.   I can also  answer or state with certainty that Infrastructure Investment does not, has not and will not over the long haul create permanent  jobs. It has been a failure ever since FDR tried it.  Once the boondoggle is complete the jobs go away and you ‘spend and tax, to create more jobs. BTW didn't you just agreed to sell one parking garage valued at 3 million tax payer dollars for 1 Million and are planning on building 5 more if you are successful in bringing Portland’s Financially Failing Light Rail Gravy/Crime to Vancouver.   As for tolls you apparently did not read the email that started this chain of emails, the True Cost of Tolls. It will be excessive. 

Your Honor, I  think that I have answered your questions.  Would you be so kind and answer mine? 

a.    Why can’t the bridge be built without Light Rail?
b.    If congestion is a problem (it is not in my opinion) why not build a 3rd bridge?

And finally, your 2/28 5.44 PM email sent to Senator Ann Rivers (R)  thanking  her for setting me straight on her position on bridge tolls.  I knew what her position was; you apparently are the one who was unaware of her position. 

As for  three years of community engagement, technical studies, independent expert reviews, and approval from the Feds. Community engagement has not been with the people. It has been between members of the Spend and Tax Crowd.  We, the people, have been excluded from two- way conversations. Our no votes have been ignored;    Forensic information provided by Tiffany Couch has been ignored. Failure to communicate with the United States Coast Guard has been a disaster. And although Federal Funding has not yet been secured, approximately 200,000 million dollars has already been spent without proper accounting and transparency.   

And, yes, I have read Senate Bill 5502.  I have to agree with Senator Benton.  Just in case Light Rail proponents ram light rail and bridge tolls down our throats Senate Bill 5502 will at least save some money for those of us on this side of the river.  BTW your honor it would be nice if you would read our Initiative Petition, allow our petition to be placed on the ballot and “Let The People Decide”.

My sincere thanks to Senators Benton and Rivers for listening to what the people are saying.

And so it goes,

Larry Patella
CDR USN (ret)

Please Read the Email exchange:
  
From: Leavitt, Tim [mailto:Tim.Leavitt@cityofvancouver.us]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 12:51 PM
To: Local Mailing List
Subject: Re: Stop Light Rail the Gravy/Crime Train

Larry -

DID YOU KNOW...that Senator Don Benton and Senator Ann Rivers (both Republicans), support tolling?

Sincerely,
Tim


Local Mailing List <lmpatella@comcast.net> wrote:
(Mailing list information, including unsubscription instructions, is located at the end of this message.) __

Good Morning,

DID YOU KNOW #2

The TRUE COST OF BRIDGE TOLLS!!!!


Although we are repeatedly told that the CRC's Light Rail Platform will cost us 3.5 Billion Dollars, CRC already has a plan in place to pay for the 5.5 Billion in tolls. Below you will see a list of components, like State Contributions and Federal Dollars, but note that their own tolling revenue schedules are planning for 3.3 billion in toll collections.  

CONSTRUCTION COST:

Total Capital Cost (Cost to Construct)                $3. 507, 000, 000
Total additional Cost (Interest, Repairs, etc.)      $2, 032, 305, 306

Total Anticipated Project Cost                            $5, 539, 305, 396 (total over 30 years)


PLANNED FUNDING SOURCES:

State of Washington                                          $   450, 000, 000.00
State of Oregon                                                $   450, 000, 000.00
New Start Grant                                                $   850, 000, 000.00
Federal Discretionary                                        $   400, 000, 000.00   (Non-existing program)
TOLLING REVENUES                                          $3, 353, 969, 345. 00 (Per CRC Finance Plan)

Total Anticipated Funding Sources                       $5, 503, 969, 345.00 

To give you some idea as to how much Bridge Tolls will INCREASE OVER THE YEARS, you need to take a look at the CRC Debt Service Schedule. 

Starting in 2019 when tolls are expected to begin, the Net Yearly Tolling Starting at $62, 373, 695 .00 will, without voter approval and annual increases, grow to $109, 676, 530. 00 being picked from your and or your children's/grandchildren's pockets in the year of 2054. 

Over that period of time the spend and tax pocket pickers will have picked $3,353,969.345 Billion dollars out of your pockets.

It could get worse.  With Historical Cost Overruns of 30 to 200 % it is my personal opinion that total cost of the CRC could reach $10 billion or more dollars

with your help we can stop the wasteful spending of your hard earned tax dollars to build a Multi-Billion Dollar Light Rail Platform.  You can help us get your Stop Light Rail Initiative Petition of the Ballot. 

Currently Our Stop Light Rail Petition is under review by the Kelso, Washington Superior Court. We need your help in getting it through the court systems. 

If you want to keep the Pocket Pickers out of your pockets and keep down town Vancouver from being destroyed Please send a donation to your Legal defense fund. 

Make your check Payable to:
“Legal Defense For Stop Light Rail Initiative (Stephen Pidgeon), and mail it to Debbie Peterson, P.O. Box 872204, Vancouver WA 98687.

And so it goes,

Larry Patella
CDR USN (ret)


From: LM Patella [mailto:lmpatella@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 1:52 PM
To: 'Leavitt, Tim'
Cc: 'don.benton@leg.wa.gov'; ann.rivers@leg.wa.gov
Subject: RE: Stop Light Rail the Gravy/Crime Train

Tim,

NO I did not, I will personally with this email ask them.   But I don’t.  As  most people in Clark County do not.  But that is not the issue,  the issue is why are the people being lied to?  There is a lot of difference between 3.5 billion and 5.3 billion along plus Cost Over runs.  Why are you afraid to  let the people decide?
Also I am certain that this boondoggle is going to pick billions out of our pockets and either destroy downtown or force business to move out so that the developers can take over with huge Agenda 21 property tax breaks.

Look forward to seeing you on Monday.

Respectfully,

Larry Patella


From: Abbott, Karmen [mailto:Karmen.Abbott@leg.wa.gov] On Behalf Of Benton, Sen. Don
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:24 PM
To: lmpatella@comcast.net; 'Leavitt, Tim'
Cc: Rivers, Sen. Ann
Subject: RE: Stop Light Rail the Gravy/Crime Train

Tim,

I have no idea what gave you the idea that I support tolling for the CRC.  I DO NOT support the CRC, which means I DO NOT support tolling of a bridge that has already been tolled, and paid for.

Sincerely,

Don

PS – If there has been any communication from me or my office that has lead you to believe that I support tolling, please indicate which communication that was so that I may correct the error.

Senator Don Benton
Deputy Majority Leader
17th Legislative District


From: Rivers, Sen. Ann [mailto:Ann.Rivers@leg.wa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 5:27 PM
To: 'Leavitt, Tim'; lmpatella@comcast.net
Cc: Benton, Sen. Don
Subject: RE: Stop Light Rail the Gravy/Crime Train

For the record Larry, I am not opposed to tolls.  I was raised in an area where tolling was a way of life.  I am, however, opposed to the CRC and tolling of this project since it has become a nightmarish story that continues to unravel. This project does nothing to reduce congestion or increase freight mobility while shunting growth of upriver economic development. I feel that I have taken on the role of protecting my constituency from this project.   There are too many concerns to list here – I believe we need a project – but this isn’t it.  ~ Ann


From: Leavitt, Tim [mailto:Tim.Leavitt@cityofvancouver.us]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 5:27 PM
To: lmpatella@comcast.net
Cc: Don Benton; Ann Rivers
Subject: RE: Stop Light Rail the Gravy/Crime Train

Ohhh...almost forgot...

And, we've been sending a lot of tax $$$ to Olympia. It's about time some of those $$$ come back too SW WA to fix our highway and interchanges and support more efficient transit!

Go get 'em Senators!

Best, Tim


From: Leavitt, Tim [mailto:Tim.Leavitt@cityofvancouver.us]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 5:23 PM
To: lmpatella@comcast.net
Cc: Don Benton; Ann Rivers
Subject: RE: Stop Light Rail the Gravy/Crime Train

BTW, I certainly don't take issue with their positions about sooty of tolling, in general, because it is a "conservative" philosophy of governance....those who use will pay part of the cost; those who don't use don't pay. And, in my research, tolling is the least costly alternative for the local share. I've asked you before if you'd prefer an increase in sales tax, property tax our business taxes...and smartly, you've refused to answer. Why? I hope it's because you understand that a) infrastructure investment creates opportunities for jobs growth from the private sector, and b) tolling is indeed less costly to Clark County residents than all the other options, and c) employers are unlikely to expand and create more jobs as traffic congestion mounts, and d) your grandchildren deserve to live in a Vancouver that is investing in their livelihoods.

Best, Tim

From: Leavitt, Tim [mailto:Tim.Leavitt@cityofvancouver.us]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 5:44 PM
To: Rivers, Sen. Ann
Cc: Local Mailing List; Don Benton
Subject: RE: Stop Light Rail the Gravy/Crime Train

Senator, thank you for setting the record straight regarding your position on tolling with Mr. Patella.

We'll disagree about the merits and value and need for this project. I'll simply stand by three years of community engagement, technical studies, independent expert reviews, and approval from the Feds.

Larry, I encourage you to review Senate Bill 5502 for details.

Best to all,

Tim

Here's The Liar in action:

Egomaniacal Mayor McSlime announces re-election bid: "Arrogance will out."

The lowest life-form in local elective politics today announce that his sado-masochistic tendencies forced him to run for re-election.

"I enjoy getting pounded by those disgusted by my lies, my lack of integrity, my complete lack of leadership; my sheer, unadulterated arrogance (second only to Jim Moeller's version) and perhaps the tinest ear in politics," McSlime spewed.  "My votes violating ethics laws for my employer are a real hoot as well," he groaned.

"Look, I get that a lot of the people out there believe I'm a lying scumbag for fooling all of your suckers into thinking I ACTUALLY, REALLY opposed tolls when I ran last time," McSlime babbled.  "But that was just to fool you idiots into voting for me," he giggled.

McSlime, who desperately needed a fake issue to separate himself from Boyce "No Choice" Poolyard, who lived on the bizarre idea that the people of Clark County needed to be enslaved over his bridge/loot rail fetish, decided to become the prototypical lying scumbag by claiming for months that he was opposed to tolls.

This blog knew he was lying, and repeatedly called the little worm out for his lies.  Unfortunately, not enough people cared to hear the truth, so they voted Mayor McScumbucket into office, where he immediately flipped, lying that he had learned what he damned well already knew while serving on the city council.

In announcing his re-election, McScummer claimed he "would not be bullied."

Hopefully, he'll come to find out that we won't be bullied by scum like him, either.

Frankly, I'm relieved.  This blog and the "Tim "The Liar" Leave-it Blog are going to pound him like a Salisbury steak.  The only question is this: will the people, obviously proven to be fooled as recently as November by re-electing scum like Jim Moeller, continue to support a lying slimebag with the integrity of a concentration camp guard for Mayor?

Tune in and find out.

(And by the way, McSlime, it takes a genuine fruit fly to announce a re-election bid on Valentine's Day.)

Leavitt out to screw us all: by all means, jack up the gas tax.

Not satisfied by trying to screw us with his CRC scam, SW Washington's elected worm comes out with this garbage:

Washington mayors, including Vancouver's Leavitt, call for gas tax hike

By Associated Press

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

digg submit

Lane, Steven

Mayor Tim Leavitt of Vancouver, left

The mayors of more than 40 cities across Washington, including Tim Leavitt of Vancouver, have sent a letter to Gov. Jay Inslee and legislative leaders, urging them to consider an 8-cent-per-gallon gas tax as a way to help pay for transportation needs.

The letter from the Mayor's Transportation Forum was sent Wednesday. Among the signees were Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn, as well as the mayors of Bellingham, Federal Way, Tacoma, Olympia and Walla Walla.

In addition to the gas tax increase, the letter suggests a motor vehicle excise tax increase of up to 1.5 percent that counties could enact by public vote or by a vote by county commissions, and the increase to the vehicle license fee from $20 to $40. The license fee could also be increased either by public vote or by a vote of local councils.

The mayors say more than $3 billion is needed to maintain roadways and bridges in the state over the next 10 years. Democrats in the state House are expected to introduce their transportation proposals next week.

Naturally, every leftist scumbag mayor wants to screw us... what else is new?

But Mayor McFly shooting himself in the foot this close to his re-electio0n announcement?

He's not only slimy... he's stupid.

Leave-it running for re-election? Let's get this party started!

The slimiest politician in SW Washington, a liar par-excellence, is likely to announce his re-election bid tomorrow... and this scribe sincerely hopes he does.

Tim "The Liar" Leavitt has earned his nickname by lying... repeatedly... to get elected last time he ran.

Most of his shtick was a made-up issue to separate himself from Royce "No choice" Pollard.

Both leave-it and I knew he was a lying scumbag: I tried to warn everyone but few would listen.  It is to this community's misfortune that he was elected, and shortly thereafter accomplished the flip that has since made him famous.

He has become the CRC's bitch.  Of course, he works for a CRC contractor so every vote he's ever taken in favor of the CRC represents a legal violation of our state ethics laws, where-in you cannot benefit, directly or indirectly from any vote you take.

The democratian will endorse him; after all, by becoming the CRC's bitch, he became their bitch as well because in Columbian land, the money sewer that is this massive rip-off is incapable of doing any wrong, and cannot be held to a standard approaching anyone... or anything... with an "R" after it's name.

Leave-it is the slimiest of the slimy.   Democrats will vote for him because while he has, on occasion, claimed to be in the GOP, he's as much in the GOP as Marc Boldt... meaning, not at all.

And that's why I'm restarting this blog... to keep people up to date on what this scumbag HAS done and IS doing.

So, tomorrow, I'll get my shot-record updated, and then I am coming after him with everything I've legally got.

At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if he won: after all the same idiots who voted Jim Moeller back into office voted this moron in as well.

But it won't be because the information defining this scuzball wasn't available.  And with any luck at all, this embarrassment to our community will soon become a footnote, just like others who have turned a deaf ear to the people they would govern.